Saturday, November 05, 2005

GAO Report Supports Premise That Ohio Electoral Votes Were Stolen

Rockford's Newspaper Rock River Times | rockford illinois news information:
"Some of the GAO’s findings are: 1. Some electronic voting machines “did not encrypt cast ballots or system audit logs, and it was possible to alter both without being detected.” In short, the machines; provided a way to manipulate the outcome of the election. In Ohio, more than 800,000 votes were cast on electronic voting machines, some registered seven times Bush’s official margin of victory.

2: the report further stated that: “it was possible to alter the files that define how a ballot looks and works, so that the votes for one candidate could be recorded for a different candidate.” Very many sworn statements and affidavits claim that did happen in Ohio in 2004.

Next, the report says, “Vendors installed uncertified versions of voting system software at the local level.” The GAO found that falsifying election results without leaving evidence of doing so by using altered memory cards could easily be done.

The GAO additionally found that access to the voting network was very easy to compromise because not all electronic voting systems had supervisory functions protected by password. That meant access to one machine gave access to the whole network. That critical finding showed that rigging the election did not take a “widespread conspiracy” but simply the cooperation of a small number of operators with the power to tap into the networked machines. They could thus alter the vote totals at will. It therefore was no big task for a single programmer to flip vote numbers to give Bush the 118,775 votes."
This has the be the biggest under-reported story of the century. I remember some reports of "irregularities" in the days following the election, but nothing seemed to come of it. Looks like the GAO doesn't forget. God bless 'em.

1 comment:

Earl said...

Hey, thanks for the BP Bump...

Still fuming in MN...

Earl

Followers

Blog Archive